Effectiveness Of Interventions For Non-Specific Low Back Pain In Older Adults. A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE PROJECT»

Effectiveness Of Interventions For Non-Specific Low Back Pain In Older Adults. A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Download This Complete Project Topic And Material (Chapter 1-5 With References and Questionnaire) Titled Effectiveness Of Interventions For Non-Specific Low Back Pain In Older Adults. A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Here On ProjectGate. See Below For The Abstract, Table Of Contents, List Of Figures, List Of Tables, List Of Appendices, List Of Abbreviations, And Chapter One. Click The Download Now Button Below To Get The Complete Project Work Instantly.

PROJECT TOPIC AND MATERIAL ON EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS FOR NON-SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN IN OLDER ADULTS. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

The Project File Details

  • Name: Effectiveness Of Interventions For Non-Specific Low Back Pain In Older Adults. A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
  • Type: PDF and MS Word (DOC)
  • Size: [70 KB]
  • Length: [56] Pages

 

 

Abstract Objectives

Systematically review the literature about all available interventions to manage non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) in older adults (≥60 years).

Design

We searched the Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, PEDro, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases reference lists for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing interventions for NSLBP. Two independent reviewers extracted data, assessed the risk of bias and completeness of the description of interventions.

Results

Eighteen (RCTs) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Evidence about interventions to manage NSLBP in older adults is weak.

Eighteen (RCTs) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Evidence about interventions to manage NSLBP in older adults is weak. electrical nerve stimulation (PENS), education, exercise or pharmacological agents were not effective to produce a clinically significant reduction in pain and disability at short-term and intermediate-term compared to sham, usual care or minimal intervention. Interventions were moderately well-described according to the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) and the risk of bias was moderate 6.4 points on the 10-point PEDro Scale (SD = 1.44).

GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT»

HIRE A WRITER IF YOU CAN NOT FIND YOUR TOPIC»

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*