Download This Complete Project Topic and Material (Chapter 1-5 With References and Questionnaire) Titled The Impact of Banking Supervision and Regulation in Nigeria and Its Effects on the Nigerian Economy. Here on Projectgate. See Below for the Abstract, Table of Contents, List of Figures, List of Tables, List of Appendices, List of Abbreviations, and Chapter One. Click the Download Now Button Below to Get the Complete Project Work Instantly.
Project Topic and Material on The Impact of Banking Supervision and Regulation in Nigeria and Its Effects on the Nigerian Economy
The Project File Details
- Name: The Impact of Banking Supervision and Regulation in Nigeria and Its Effects on the Nigerian Economy
- Type: PDF and Ms Word (Doc)
- Size: [96Kb]
- Length:  Pages
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter summarizes the research findings and also presents conclusions and recommendations of the study. The conclusions are drawn from the findings of the study which sought to establish the impact of banking supervision and regulation in Nigeria and its effects on the Nigerian economy.
The objective of this study was to establish the impact of banking supervision and regulation in Nigeria and its effects on the Nigerian economy. The variables of regulation included capital regulation requirement, liquidity requirement ratio and risk management while performance of commercial banks was measured using return on assets.
In terms of the study’s goal, it was discovered that capital regulation, liquidity, and risk management all had a favorable impact on return on assets. The research discovered that the correlation between return on assets and mean capital need was 0.561, with a p-value of 0.000, demonstrating a positive association between the two. Since the p-value was 0.0000.05, the connection was significant at the 5% level of significance. Return on assets and mean liquidity requirements have a positive correlation of 0.595, which is significant at the 5% level of significance, whereas return on assets and mean risk management have a positive connection, but it is not significant at the 5% level of significance (p-value 0.115>0.05).
In addition, the regression analysis reveals that capital requirements, liquidity ratio requirements, and risk management have no substantial impact on return on assets. This implies that other variables, including as capital requirements, liquidity, and risk management, may have an impact on the banking sector’s return on assets. The model’s F value yields a p-value of 0.670, which is substantially higher than zero. For normally distributed data, a p-value of 7.060 is more than the predefined threshold of significance of 0.05. This indicates that the model is ineffective in understanding banking sector performance. This implies that other research may incorporate other performance factors.
The correlation coefficient was 0.609, indicating that there was a high positive link between return on assets and mean capital need, mean liquidity requirement, and mean risk management, according to the research.
According to the findings, capital regulation, liquidity requirements, and risk management all have a beneficial impact on return on assets. The research also discovered that the mean capital and liquidity requirements had a considerable impact on return on assets. The average risk management, on the other hand, has no influence on the return on assets. Overall, the research concluded that the model is ineffective in describing banking sector performance. This implies that there are additional factors that influence commercial banks’ return on assets in Nigeria.
Furthermore, bank inspections should continue to be regular and timely, and bank control measures should not be too stringent as to have a long-term and negative impact on banking operations. Finally, ongoing reforms, particularly the decision to reclassify, commercial banks, should be revisited before full implementation, taking into account the negative impact, which includes but is not limited to a reduction in credit loan grants to the public, particularly the private sector. Finally, bank supervision should be carried out by only qualified and neutral bank examiners.
In Nigeria, banking sector regulation is critical, particularly in light of recent commercial bank failures. It is a critical problem in boosting the country’s prosperity via long-term financial stability. As a result, the government should foster a favorable regulatory environment. It is advised that the banking industry not be too restricted since this might lead to knowledge asymmetry and, as a result, poor bank performance. Appropriate restrictions, on the other hand, should be put in place to restore sanity to the industry.
The following recommendations were made based on the findings:
- Bank inspections shall continue to be conducted on a regular basis, as well as in a timely and fair way, in order to detect and address any unfavorable trends in the banks as soon as possible.
- Supervisory and control activities can only be efficiently carried out by qualified and trained bank examiners. As a result, continuous training for bank supervisors is required to keep them up to date on the newest innovations in banking operations and financial reporting oversight and investigation.
- Any allegations of wrongdoing should be thoroughly examined and disciplinary action taken as soon as possible.
- The control measures should be devised and executed in such a manner that they do not have a detrimental effect on bank operations and performance, particularly in terms of loan/credit giving and profitability.
- The CBN’s continuing reforms, including the elimination of universal banking and the reclassification of commercial banks, should be severely reexamined, since the management of the commercial banks under investigation faults their installations.
5.5 Suggestions for Further Studies
This research examined the impact of banking supervision and regulation in Nigeria and its effects on the Nigerian economy. As a result, further research will be very useful in determining what actually impacts the financial success of commercial banks. Other academics with a genuine interest in the subject may do research on regulation and its influence on financial performance with the goal of conducting a cross-country comparison study and a thorough analytical review. Another research in Nigeria might be undertaken, but the variables should be expanded. Market discipline, regulatory authority, and beginning capital stringency competition from commercial banks are all elements that might be included. This kind of research will benefit from having a large number of variables.
Further research should be conducted to assess how capital requirements might improve financial stability in Nigerian commercial banks, according to the report. This will provide a comprehensive examination of the influence of capital restrictions on Nigerian financial performance.